Tulsi Gabbard: Trump response to Saudi oil strikes a ‘disgrace’


>>Neil: ALL RIGHT. THE PRESIDENT HAS ALREADY ORDERED INCREASED SANCTIONS FOLLOWING THAT ATTACK THAT THE IRANIANS WERE NOW BEHIND OR OUR INTELLIGENCE SAYS THAT ON SAUDI ARABIA. DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT CHAPEL CANDIDATE TULSI GABBARD WONDERS IF THE PRESIDENT IS DOING OUR COUNTRY’S BIDDING OR SAUDI ARABIA’S. IT’S HARD TO SAY. CONGRESSMAN, VERY GOOD TO HAVE YOU.>>THANKS, NEIL. GOOD TO SEE YOU.>>Neil: WHAT SURPRISED FOLKS IS THE DEGREE TO WHICH YOU HAMMERED THAT CHARGE OF THE PRESIDENT THAT SAID YOU’RE NOT OUR PIMP. WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT?>>WELL, LET’S JUST MAKE SURE THAT WE’RE ON THE SAME PAGE HERE AND RECOGNIZE THE CONTEXT. WHAT I WAS RESPONDING TO THAT THE PRESIDENT TWEETED OUT AND I WANT TO READ YOU WHAT HE SAID IN THAT TWEET SAYING THAT “WE’RE WAITING TO HEAR FROM THE KINGDOM AS TO WHO THEY BELIEVE WAS THE CAUSE OF THIS ATTACK AND UNDER WHAT TERMS WE WOULD PROCEED.” LOOK, NEIL, I’M A SOLDIER. I TOOK AN OATH AS A SOLDIER AND A MEMBER OF CONGRESS TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND OUR CONSTITUTION, TO SERVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. AND IT’S A HUGE DISGRACE TO HEAR OUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF BASICALLY PUT US IN A POSITION, PUT US, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN UNIFORM, OUR MILITARY ASSETS IN A POSITION WHERE WE’RE SERVANTS OF THE SAUDI KINGDOM. STANDING BY AND AWAITING THEIR ORDERS ON HOW WE SHOULD PROCEED.>>Neil: WAS HE SAYING THAT, CONGRESS WOMAN, AS MUCH AS THAT THEY’RE LOOKING INTO THIS. THEY’RE NOT MARCHING ORDERS HERE. THEY’RE TRYING TO ASCERTAIN WHO WAS BEHIND THAT ATTACK AND THAT IS WHAT I THINK HE WAS WAITING ON.>>WELL, IF TRUMP DIDN’T MEAN WHAT HE SAID WHEN HE TWEETED THAT OUT, THAT WE’VE GOT TO SEE UNDER WHAT TERMS WE WOULD PROCEED, THEN HE NEEDS TO CLARIFY WHAT HE SAID AND ACTUALLY SAY WHAT HE MEANT. HE’S THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. HE’S THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF THE STRONGEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD. HE NEEDS TO BE CLEAR. THIS WAS SAID A COUPLE DAYS AGO, HE’S NOT ISSUED ANY KIND OF CLARIFICATION. ALL WE CAN PRESUME IS HE SAID WHAT HE MEANT IN THAT TWEET.>>Neil: ALL RIGHT. HE’S NOT RESPONDED TO YOUR ALLEGATIONS OR EVEN TWEETED A RESPONSE. BUT WHAT YOU DID SAID, I NEVER ENGAGE IN HATEFUL RHETORIC AGAINST YOU OR YOUR FAMILY, NEVER WILL BUT YOU’RE OFFERING OUR MILITARY ASSETS TO THE DICTATOR OF SAUDI ARABIA. THE QUESTION I HAD FOR YOU, CONGRESSWOMAN, IF YOU BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND SAUDI ARABIA WERE ATTACKED LIKE IT WAS HERE AND APPARENTLY BY IRAN, WOULD YOU NOT INTERVENE?>>I WOULD DO WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR COUNTRY. AS A SOLDIER I SEE THESE THINGS VERY CLEARLY, SEEING WHAT IS OUR GOAL, WHAT IS OUR OBJECTIVE. WITH IRAN, WE HAVE TWO PRIMARY OBJECTIVES. NUMBER 1, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY’RE NO LONGER MOVING FORWARD OF BUILDING THEIR NUCLEAR CAPABILITY AS THEY CURRENTLY ARE. NUMBER 2, TO PREVENT THIS ALL-OUT SHOOTING WAR WITH IRAN THAT IT APPEARS WE’RE HEADING TOWARDS, THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR TWO REASONS. NUMBER 1, WE HAVE TO KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. KEEP THAT AT THE FOREFRONT. WE CAN ACCOMPLISH THESE OBJECTIVES BY UNDERSTANDING AND REALIZING THAT THE CURRENT STRATEGY HAS FAILED. IT’S NOT HELPING US ACHIEVE THAT OBJECTIVE AND WE NEED TO REENTER THE IRAN NUCLEAR AGREEMENT AND GET RID OF THESE CRIPPLING ECONOMIC SANCTIONS THAT ARE CONTINUING TO ESCALATE THIS WAR AGAINST IRAN.>>Neil: WELL, IRAN HAS BEEN DOING THIS STUFF WITH OR WITHOUT SANCTIONS, WITH OR WITHOUT A DEAL. DOESN’T –>>THAT’S NOT TRUE.>>Neil: THEIR PROVOCATIVE BEHAVIOR –>>THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL WAS IN PLACE, IRAN WAS FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE BY OUR OWN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND OTHER COUNTRIES AGENCIES. THEY WERE COMPLYING WITH THE DEAL. THEY WERE NOT MOVING FORWARD TOWARD BUILDING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. NOW IT’S IN THE TRASH, IRAN IS CONTINUING –>>Neil: THE NUCLEAR DEAL NOT WITHSTANDING, THEY’VE ALWAYS BEEN PROVOCATIVE. WHAT I WOULD ASK YOU, WOULD YOU AS PRESIDENT THEN IGNORE THAT PROVOCATION, DEAL OR NO DEAL, WOULD YOU WORK WITH THE SAUDIS? DO YOU LIKE THE SAUDIS MORE OR LESS THAN IRAN? WHAT?>>IT’S NOT ABOUT WHO YOU LIKE OR WHO YOU DON’T LIKE. IT’S ABOUT ONCE AGAIN FOCUSING ON OUR OBJECTIVE OF KEEPING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. WHAT HAS JUST HAPPENED AND TRANSPIRED THE LAST FEW DAYS DIDN’T JUST POP UP OUT OF NOWHERE. WE CAN’T LOOK AT THIS IN ISOLATION. IT WAS KICKED OFF BY PRESIDENT TRUMP WALKING AWAY FROM AND THROWING THAT NUCLEAR DEAL IN THE TRASH, INCREASING — CRIPPLING ECONOMIC SANCTIONS THAT ARE HURTING THE PEOPLE OF IRAN MOST OF ALL, DESIGNATING THEIR MILITARY AS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION, DEPLOYING MORE TROOPS TO THE REGION. A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT HAVE PUSHED US, THE WORLD, TO THIS POINT WHERE WE ARE TODAY.>>Neil: SO LET ME ASK YOU. DO YOU RECOGNIZE THE LEADER OF SAUDI ARABIA? A LOT OF SIGNALS POINT THAT HE WAS BEHIND THE KILLING OF “THE WASHINGTON POST” JOURNALIST A YEAR AGO. BUT HE’S STILL IN CHARGE. OTHERS HAVE SAID YOU CAN’T PICK AND CHOOSE YOUR LEADERS OF COUNTRIES YOU DON’T LIKE. IT IS WHAT IT IS. WOULD YOU TALK WITH HIM, DEAL WITH HIM ON AN ATTACK LIKE THIS, DO SOMETHING IN CONCERT WITH HIM?>>I THINK IT’S IMPORTANT UNDER THESE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES TO BE READY AND TO HAVE THE WILLINGNESS TO TALK TO LEADERS OF OTHER COUNTRIES. YES, I WOULD MEET WITH THE LEADER OF SAUDI ARABIA AS I WOULD WITH THE LEADER OF IRAN TO DEESCALATE THESE TENSIONS AND SAYING WHAT IS THE BEST INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES AND HOW CAN WE BEST ACCOMPLISH THAT OBJECTIVE, WHICH IS KEEPING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. DOING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR NATIONAL SECURITY. BY PURSUING THESE DIPLOMATIC MEASURES, WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PREVENT THAT WORST CASE SCENARIO, WHICH IS AN ALL-OUT SHOOTING CONFLICT WAR THAT WOULD CAUSE A DEVASTATING COST TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, TO OUR TROOPS, COUNTLESS LIVES, TRILLIONS MORE DOLLARS. TO SPEAK OF THE IMPACT ON THE DEVASTATION THAT WOULD BE CAUSED AROUND THE REGION AND THE WORLD.>>Neil: ALL RIGHT. SO THE INTERPRETATION IS THAT YOU WANT TO BRING BACK THE IRAN DEAL. BUT IT GIVES A SIGNAL HERE THAT YOU’RE NO FAN OF THE SAUDI LEADERSHIP. I GET THAT. BUT MORE OF A FAN OF THE LEADERSHIP IN IRAN.>>NO, I’M A FAN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. I’M A FAN OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. AS PRESIDENT AND COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, I WOULD PUT THEIR INTERESTS –>>Neil: IS IT IN OUR INTEREST FOR SAUDI ARABIA TO BE PROTECTED OR ITS KINGDOM TO BE PROTECTED OR DO YOU DRAW A DISTINCTION?>>LET ME TELL YOU WHAT IS NOT IN OUR INTERESTS. THIS ALLIANCE THAT HAS BEEN LONGSTANDING BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND SAUDI ARABIA IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DIRECTLY AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTLY SUPPORTING AL-QAEDA. WE JUST OBSERVED THE 18th ANNIVERSARY OF THAT TERRIBLE ATTACK ON OUR COUNTRY IN 2001. THEY’RE CONTINUING TO SPEND BILLIONS EVERY YEAR PROPAGATING THIS EXTREMIST IDEOLOGY THAT IS FUELLING THE GROWTH OF TERRORIST GROUPS LIKE AL-QUAIDA AND ISES AND OTHERS AROUND THE WORLD. THEY’RE DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THOSE THAT POSE A THREAT TO OUR COUNTRY AND TO THE UNITED STATES. THAT THREAT THAT WE NEED TO DEFEAT.>>Neil: IS THAT THREAT GREATER THAN IRAN?>>YES; IT IS.>>Neil: SAUDI ARABIA IS MORE OF A PROBLEM FOR US –>>IRAN DOES NOT POSE A DIRECT THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES. WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PREVENT IRAN FROM CONTINUING TO MOVE FORWARD TOWARDS DEVELOPING A NUCLEAR WEAPON. THAT IS WHERE WE NEED TO BE FOCUSED. IF I WERE PRESIDENT, THAT’S WHAT I’D BE DOING, GETTING BACK INTO THAT NUCLEAR DEAL, GETTING RID OF THESE CRIPPLING ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND BEING ABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN MOVE FORWARD IN THE INTERESTS OF OUR NATIONAL SECURITY.>>Neil: SO A PRESIDENT GABBARD WOULD SEE SAUDI ARABIA AS A BIGGER THREAT TO OUR COUNTRY THAN IRAN.>>WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS SAUDI ARABIA ENDING THEIR SUPPORT FOR AL-QUAIDA. TERRORIST GROUPS LIKE AL-QUAIDA.>>Neil: I’M SORRY. THAT’S NOT WHAT I ASKED.>>I KNOW. YOU’RE TURNING MY WORDS AROUND.>>Neil: NO, NO, NO. I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR. YOU HAVE HIGHER OPINION OF IRAN THAN YOU DO SAUDI ARABIA.>>NO, THAT’S NOT WHAT I’M SAYING.>>Neil: EXPLAIN.>>I’M FOCUSED ON HOW WE CAN BEST KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SAFE. ON HOW WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE — WE HAVE OUR NATIONAL SECURITY INTACT.>>Neil: THE SAUDIS ARE A BIGGER LET TO THAT SAFETY THAN IRAN? I WANT TO BE CLEAR.>>THE SAUDIS ARE DIRECTLY SUPPORTING THE VERY TERRORIST GROUP THAT ATTACKED US ON 9-11 AND CONTINUE TO POSE A THREAT TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TODAY.>>Neil: SO IF THE PRESIDENT WERE TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST IRAN WITH OR WITHOUT SAUDI INTELLIGENCE OR HELP, THAT WOULD BE A BAD MOVE IN YOUR EYES?>>THAT WOULD BE A VERY BAD MOVE. IT WOULD NOT SERVE THE INTERESTS OF THE UNITED STATES. IT WOULD COST THOUSANDS MORE OF MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN UNIFORM THEIR LIVES. IT WOULD COST US AS TAXPAYERS TRILLIONS — WOULD MAKE THE IRAQ WAR THAT I SERVED IN LOOK LIKE A PICNIC COMPARED TO THE COST AND THE CONSEQUENCE AND THE DEVASTATION THAT WOULD COME ABOUT AS A RESULT OF THAT WAR. TO SPEAK OF THE FACT THAT IT WOULD BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL GIVEN THE PRESIDENT WOULD DO THAT WITHOUT THAT AUTHORITY COMING

Maurice Vega

100 Responses

  1. DEMOCRATS JUST WANTS TO SEE CHAOS AND THROWS MORE FIRE TO THE CONFLICTS…YOU DON'T SIMPLY GO TO WAR..WITH IRAN WITHOUT ALL THE INTERNATIONAL ALLIES SUPPORTING…!

  2. when are we going to wake uo to the grace of diplomacy. How much longer do our leaders need to asked weither we are going to engage in civilized discussions with our “enemies” for the betterment of our countrymen….and for that matter,,,our fellow human beings.

  3. Saoudis brought the towers down and they are american's friends ??? this is just insane ! they are people you cannot trust !!!! they will turn these weapons against you and europeans !!! You cannot trust arabs, they will stab you in the back !!! I am for Iran !! they are not arabs but persians !! Iranians are well educated, but they need to get rid of their fanatics religious leaders ! Same in the usa, get rid of these evangelicals, they are as dangerous as the talibans !! they will take your freedoms aways !!

  4. Trump fucks up everything !!!! he is so viscerally jealous of President Obama, he has undone every things good that Obama did to keep the american people SAFE !! GET HIM OUT !!!!

  5. Yes, thank you Tulsi for educating the very uneducated fox news viewers !! they are totally ignorant of what is going on !!! they only watch fox fake news and nothing else !!

  6. i thought shes smart but ..
    when she said Iranian nuclear deal is torn up ..as far we all know that deal is still on and legitimate ..its USA who withdraw from that Deal and 8 countries + Iran are still in agreement

  7. Recently there was supposedly an Iranian strike against a Japanese tanker…while Shinzo Abe was in Iran working an oil deal with them. Sounded just as bogus as this incident. Where did the Intel for this alleged strike on Saudi Arabia come from? What are the details, like how many Saudis were killed (0), was the damage so bad that it requires a US military response instead of better Saudi security measures? How about covering that, Neil?

  8. Hey @foxnews why not just retitle the video to "Ten minutes of a talking head trying to get Gabbard to say she prefers Iran to Saudi Arabia". Your title is clickbait.

  9. "Remove the economic sanction and re enter the nuclear deal"…..the true face of Tulsi revealed. Do not be deceived by her fake patriotism.

  10. Someone please tell Tulsi the US military is NOT the most powerful on the planet. The US military is a losing team without any genuine purpose since 1945. It's just a corporate tool and it is led by inept officers and complicit functionaries based on their measurable results. They can't keep the peace or win any wars either based on their outcomes. Stop being a tool Tulsi, you represent a losing team. The first step to getting any better is admitting the US military is a losing team without any honest purpose, not the best.

  11. nobody in america wants to talk about the illegal yemen war in which america is complicit in countless warcrimes so this blabbering is worth nothing and america will pay for these warcrimes one way or another if it doesnt leave and stop its aggression against the yemenis and people should ask themselves who will safe americans from their elites if not them because american elites are surely ready to sacrifice all americans if it means that they can sit on the "immortal throne" they build for themselves and who knows today it might be fiction but tomorrow it might be reality that robocop butchers civilians for no reason other than his owner demanding him to

  12. It was the Houthi that destroyed the Saudi Aramco plant, not Iran, dickhead. Houthi admitted it & celebrated it. What a tool this presenter is

  13. Trump just wanted to see the facts , and not just jump. You are turning the whole thing around like dems are always doing .Tulsi is falling right in line She would rather keep paying them billions. Do you really think they just built the tech to shoot our drone down since we stopped paying them c'mon girl

  14. If it was Iran Why is the missile labeled as a MC-79050 ??? is MC in the Persian alphabet.??? Did we sell missiles to Iran or Saudi Arabia? Hmmmm

  15. Just lost what little respect I had for tulsi.. she's not going anywhere anyway. If I hear her play military tune one more time I'll get sick.

  16. Grabbard is a traitorous Iranian agent, a stooge for the Ayatollahs. She's highly dishonest by setting up a false dichotomy between being tough on Iran or total war with Iran. I'm no special pleader for the Saudis, who I dislike intensely, but they are not seeking nuclear weapons, unlike Iran.

  17. Tulsi is very logical. However — and this is a big however — she tends to use an appeal-to-authority fallacy — she treats herself as an “authority” simply because she is in the military — which is obviously an informal logical fallacy. Is she right? Well, maybe. But my gut tells me that she tends to be against military action even when it might be in our best interest. It is similar to “gatekeeping” behavior seen by the quarterback of the Browns — Baker Mayfield — where he “argues” that, if you haven’t played football you have no right to an opinion. Um, no. No to Baker and no to Tulsi. (She also uses an appeal-to-emotion fallacy where she seems to always argue over the “safety” of individuals in the military over the safety of Americans, in general. Luckily our leaders didn’t take this position during WWII.)

  18. So you’re telling me an Iranian drone got past a US state of the art missile defense system deployed all over the region? Then past a Saudi state of the art missile defense system? Also their drone didn’t leave a radar signature? Sounds fishy right? Can you say war manufacturing.

  19. She says she took an oath to defend the Constitution LOL is that why she attacks the Second Amendment like she does. This woman is a liar and doesn't have a chance of ever being president. Thank you for your service but go home now because we don't want any more LOL Democrats don't want you and Republicans don't want you. Bye bye now

  20. I am not a Democrat but I will be registering dem for the primaries. If the dems manage to defeat DT in 2020 then we should at least help keep one of these corrupt dems like Biden or Warren from winning their nomination!!! The real elections are the primaries so we can get a choice rather than have to choose from the least of two evils!!!

  21. If US want war with, Iran, then they will have to take on, China and Russia, because they have made Hugh investment in that region…and not even US will mess it up for them….very soon petrodollars would become petroyen… America is no longer the only superpower…those days are gone when they can create propaganda to go to war with any country they please.

  22. Both Israel and Saudi Arabia are run by Sabbatean Satanists who we fund and give cash to. America is just the big 'ranch' where they raise their soldiers for slaughter.

  23. Very interesting and en lighting interview, Rep Tulsi stated that Saudia Arabia is supporting Al Quieda , if what she says is true, something needs to be done about that, and now !

  24. Saudis have the capability of destroying Yemen, but they can't defend their own assets? even with billions of dollars of US military technology? Bull sh!t

  25. TULSI PLEASE!…President TRUMP is 5 steps AHEAD OF YOU! STAY A SOLDIER!, judge ur Character Tulsi, need to take care of your home front FIRST VETERANS issues!)… Well, you disobeyed the newly elect President Trump told you Not to go to Syria, but u did accomplishing NOTHING (No WORLD PEACE!). & calling our(MY) President a Saudi Arabia B—–!, remember??? your email???.. I double dog dare you to apologize to President Trump in PERSON!! you can tell Kamala Harris to apologize for she did (lets backup) & YOU DO THE SAME! don't Trust What you say!, All talk & Fluff!! President Trump is A DOER!!!.. Ahui'Hou!(until next time!), Local island girl Born & Raised!!

  26. If Iran is a Dictatorship, what is Saudi Arabia it is one of the worst Dictatorship, the only difference is it buys American military hardware . As Trump said Saudi's pay cash .

  27. WHY does the USA seem like they always want to act as the World Police? If two nations want to go to war, WHY does the USA feel a need to be a part of it? The USA, China, Russia, UK, France, Germany, etc. should stay out of the middle east and let them figure it all out for themselves.

  28. thank you Tulsi for a voice of reason and intelligence! The fox news idiot is a delusional fool of a tool! We need you as Secretary of State at least, with your knowledge and understanding!

  29. She jumping the gun. She needs to respect the Commander in Chief. I doubt Tulsi will become President when did she become and expert on deals. She changes her tune when running for President. Scare tactics. Keeping America safe is scared tactics.

  30. I'm thinking everyone is missing the BIG picture here, or everyone is cool with it. She says Saudis have been funding our "favorite" terror groups then and now. 18 years on, 18 more years to come? And only a couple people pick it up. Is everybody now cool with it???? Do we want this stuff over or don't we??? Recognize! No other politician, yours or mine, are hitting us with this truth bomb. Forget the Pres. race, pick up this ball and run with it. Its all here on YT, at indie media channels. Facts, not fiction. Research it from where you sit. Clearly Cavuto is cool with it, can't stop for a minute. The other corporate "news" sites are no better.

  31. Check, IS. is in Yemen now, where? Saudi controlled territory. Check, Yemenis had IS. in a prison, Saudis bombed the prison, let 'em out. Check, NATO used T.grps in Libya as ground troops, bombed Gaddafi's escape route, got him skewered in the a**, "We came, we saw, he died!"

  32. Tulsi, am on your side, may God protect you always.
    He is putting words wrongly against Tulsi. Finally there’s a real woman that got B** to face all this bunch two face hypocrites.
    TULSI WE LOVE YOU!!!

  33. South Arabia is not our friend! It's a dictatorship, that forward extreme ideologies, and do not shear our values. This is why I believe the war against global warming is a war against terrorism; when we stop our dependency on petroleum and spear the movement on green energy then we will be the one calling the shots.

  34. You would meet with these dictators and you would do the same as Obama. Give them what they want, and next thing you know they got nuclear weapons. How is that making American citizens safe tulsi

  35. This woman is a walking contradiction. She "would do what ever is in the best interest of our country"? If she's going to attack Trump for what she perceives as vagueness, she should express a bit more clarity of her own ideas. Maybe she has an identifiable detailed plan as to how she would proceed. Trump also may have a detailed plan but he's the president and she's not! Sure, Trump should lay out every card face up so every evil dictator in the world should be able to plan a counter strategy. Give me a break! Tulsi is just more of the same political scrambling attempting to undermine the president. At first I thought she was fairly genuine. Now I just consider her another one of "THEM".

  36. Tulsi speaks the truth on American foreign policy. She represents those who must do the actual fighting. Unfortunately we will never get a chance to vote for her because the deep state and the military industrial complex will make sure she doesn't go far in the primaries.

  37. Gabbard will say anything scripted to her, to disparage President Trump just as every other Socialist in her party. Nothing new, nothing notable, a big nothing burger.

  38. Tulsi handles herself well, speaks like a normal, rational, compassionate American and avoiding the polarizing, inflated rhetoric of a slick word merchant like Obama. The Fox News interviewer, however, tried to ambush her with word traps along the fashion of what I have come to expect from CNN or MSNBC. He failed.

  39. The virtue signallers must want all Saudi oil production bombed.
    Fossil fuels are out, we'll make solar panels and windmills with no thermal coal for steel, no mining of neodymium etc, no oil to transport the billions of solar panels.

  40. If you don't want to spend $10,000,000 on a loaf of bread then we have to keep OPEC oil secured. I think pegging the dollar to their oil is considered the mother load of ally agreements!

  41. There is no need for the US to act as a guardian for Saudi Arabia. They have purchased billion of dollars worth of armament from the US, the UK, France, Germany and Sweden. They can take care of themselves. As Tulsi pointed out they have been medalling around the world and causing unrest for a long time. 15 of the 19 September 11th attackers at the trade centre were Saudi citizens. Iran, perhaps, would make a good ally to the US someday.

  42. TULSI…TRUMP WILL NEVER TWEET YOU BECAUSE , WHILE I AM A TRUMP SUPPORTER, I WOULD ACTUALLY CONSIDER VOTING FOR YOU. TRUMP KNOWS THAT

  43. She’s good at speaking but @2:36, what is our best interest for our soldiers? She says what is our goal & what is our objective, isn’t that what trump is doing?!? Once those questions are answered, then he can make a decision

  44. Her analysis is amateur. She took President Trump's comments out of context trying to gain political capital. She has a narrow viewpoint, without considering the global picture and America's overall long term best interest in mind. Just because she's a soldier doesn't mean she has the depth of the statesmanship that President Trump has.

  45. Yeah, stop motivating Iran and other nations to arm themselves to the teeth and then discover the trick of nuclear non-proliferation. Sanders/Gabbard 2020 and discover real peace, man

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post comment