Stephen Colbert and Bill O’Reilly Discuss The Political Response To Orlando


WE’RE BACK HERE WITH BILL
O’REILLY. SO BEFORE WE WENT ON THE BREAK,
YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS CALL, WE NEED AN ALL-OUT WAR ON
THE ISLAMIC STATE.>>YES.>>Stephen: WHAT DOES THAT
MEAN?>>IT MEANS CONGRESS SHOULD PASS
A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST ISLAMIC TERRORIST GROUPS —
AL QUAIDA, I.S.I.S., THERE ARE FOUR OR FIVE OF THEM.>>Stephen: ARE WE NOT AT WAR
WITH AL QUAIDA AT NOT.>>WE ARE.>>Stephen: DOESN’T THE
AUTHORIZATION FOR MILITARY FORCE COVER ANYTHING WE WANT TO DO?>>YEAH, THE PRESIDENT HAS THE
AUTHORITY TO DO IT BUT IF YOU MAKE A DECLARATION OF WAR IT
DOES A NUMBER OF THINGS, IT GIVES AUTHORITIES INSIDE THE
UNITED STATES FAR MORE LATITUDE TO DETAIN AN OMAR MATEEN.>>Stephen: YOU COULD DETAIN
AN AMERICAN CITIZEN –>>IF YOU’RE AT WAR, A NUMBER OF
DIFFERENT THINGS, YOU CAN DETAIN PEOPLE. F.D.R. DID IT WITH THE JAPANESE. I THINK HE MADE A MISTAKE, BUT
HE DID IT. THE WAR DECLARATION TAKES THE
PROTECTION OF YOUR AUDIENCE AND YOU AND ME AWAY FROM LAW
ENFORCEMENT AND PUTS IT INTO THE MILITARY PRECINCTS. NUMBER TWO, N.A.T.O. WOULD THEN
BE MOBILIZED AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO JOIN IN THE FIGHT AGAINST
THESE JIHADIST GROUPS BY TREATY.>>Stephen: AFTER 9/11, THIS
IS THE LARGEST LOSS OF LIFE IN AN ATTACK IN THE UNITED STATES
AFTER 9/11. AFTER 9/11, WE WENT TO WAR IN
IRAQ. TREATED IT AS A MILITARY —
>>THAT WAS A MISTAKE.>>Stephen: WHY IS THIS NOT A
MISTAKE?>>WE WOULDN’T BE AN OCCUPIER
HERE. THIS IS A WAR OF ATTRITION
AGAINST A TERROR GROUP. IT’S THE SAME PHILOSOPHY AS THE
NAZIS. IT’S THE THIRD REICH, IT’S THE
SAME.>>Stephen: HOW DOES THAT STOP
A LONE GUNMAN IN THE UNITED STATES.>>I TOLD YOU YOU CAN’T STOP
THAT.>>Stephen: WHY WOULD WE THEN
DECLARE WAR BASED ON THIS? (APPLAUSE)
>>BECAUSE THEN, RATHER THAN OUTSOURCING THE FIGHT AGAINST
I.S.I.S. TO THE KURDS, N.A.T.O. WOULD DO IT, AND N.A.T.O. WOULD
THEN DESTROY COMMAND AND CONTROL OF I.S.I.S., ALL RIGHT, AND
AL QUAIDA, DESTROY IT. SO THERE WOULD BE — RIGHT NOW,
GUYS LIKE MATEEN THINKS I.S.I.S. IS WINNING BECAUSE THEY’RE ON
THE INTERNET AND I.S.I.S. IS TELLING THEM THEY’RE WINNING AND
CAUSING ALL KINDS OF TROUBLE. ONCE THE WORLD SEES THESE PEOPLE
ARE BEING ANNIHILATED, AND I MEAN ANNIHILATED, THE WHOLE
PROPAGANDA, WE’RE WINNING THE JIHAD, THE CALIPHATE, WE’RE
GOING TO GET THIS ESTABLISHED, VANISHES.>>Stephen: DOES IT
NECESSARILY VANISH? BECAUSE IN THE MUSLIM WORLD, IT
IS NEARLY PROVERBIAL NOW THAT REGARDLESS OF WHAT HAPPENS TO
ENEMIES — DECLARED ENEMIES IN THE UNITED STATES, THEY’RE GIVEN
PRETTY GOOD PRESS THEY’RE SURVIVING OR THRIVING AND THE
STREET IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES DON’T FIND OUT.>>TELEVISION IS TELEVISION AND
INTERNET IS INTERNET AND THE PICTURES TELL THE STORY. AND THEN THE OTHER REASON ABOUT
DECLARING WAR IS TO PROTECT THE REFUGEES, THE HUNDREDS OF
THOUSANDS OF REFUGEES WHO ARE NOW STORMING INTO EUROPE AND
WOMEN AND CHILDREN DROWNING IN E ME MEDITERRANEAN SEA, ONCE YOU
DECLARE WAR AND MOVE IN SERIOUS N.A.T.O. TROOPS, YOU CAN PROTECT
THOSE PEOPLE.>>Stephen: AND DO YOU HAVE TO
HOLD THAT LAND?>>NO. YOU DON’T HAVE TO HOLD THE
LAND — YOU’RE NOT TRYING TO BRING DEMOCRACY TO SYRIA. YOU’RE TRYING TO ANNIHILATE AN
ENEMY THAT NEEDS TO BE ANNIHILATED.>>Stephen: WHO TAKES OVER
ONCE THAT’S DONE?>>YOU WORK WITH WHOEVER YOU
FEEL IS TRUSTWORTHY IN THE COUNTRY BUT WE CANNOT DICTATE
HOW THESE COUNTRIES RUN THEMSELVES PARTICULARLY IN A
MUSLIM WORLD BECAUSE THEIR VALUE SYSTEM IS WAY DIFFERENT FROM
OURS.>>Stephen: WHEN IS THE WAR
OVER?>>WHEN THE LEVEL OF TERRORISM
GOES DOWN, THE REFUGEES CAN RETURN HOME, AND YOU HAVE A
BASIC HANDLE ON THE SITUATION. LOOK, WE KNOW WHAT THE DANGER
IS, WE KNOW WHAT THE COST IS, AND WE KNOW IT’S BEEN GOING ON
FAR TOO LONG. SO NOW IT’S TIME FOR AMERICA TO
STEP UP ITS POWER AND TAKE CARE OF THESE S.O.B.s. (APPLAUSE)
>>Stephen: WE DO HAVE TO GO. I WANT TO ASK A COUPLE MORE
QUESTIONS. LET’S SEE WHAT WE CAN AGREE ON
HERE. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF DONALD
TRUMP’S RESPONSE SO FAR?>>WELL, IT’S A POLITICAL
RESPONSE.>>Stephen: SEEMS FAIRLY
SELF-CONGRATULATORY.>>YES, IT IS. HE’S A POLITICIAN. IT SHOULDN’T SHOCK YOU.>>Stephen: THERE ARE OTHER
POLITICIANS WHO WOULD NOT SAY, I APPRECIATE THE CONGRATS OR I
CALLED IT. THAT’S NOT POLITICAL BEHAVIOR. THAT’S GRANDSTANDING. (APPLAUSE)
>>HE’S USING THE ISSUE TO BOAST HIS POPULARITY.>>Stephen: SO MAKING TERROR A
TOOL.>>RIGHT.>>Stephen: IS HILLARY CLINTON
DOING THE SAME THING.>>I HOPE TO GET HILLARY ON
LATER IN THE WEEK.>>Stephen: DO YOU THINK SHE’S
DOING THE SAME THING?>>HERE’S THE DIFFERENCE, TRUMP
IS BRINGING A ROBUST I’M GOING TO GET THESE GUYS ATTITUDE TO
THE TABLE. MRS. CLINTON IS BRINGING A MORE
NUANCED SITUATION. TRUMP IS BETTING THAT THE
COUNTRY NOW WANTS A REAL AVENGER. THAT’S WHAT HE’S BETTING, ALL
RIGHT? MRS. CLINTON, SHE’S VERY TIED
INTO THE OBAMA LEGACY RIGHT NOW BECAUSE SHE NEEDS HIM TO
CAMPAIGN.>>Stephen: SHE MIGHT ALSO
BELIEVE IT.>>IT’S POLITICAL ADVANTAGE, IF
THAT’S WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT, TO TRUMP ON THIS ONE. HE HAS THE ADVANTAGE ON THIS
ONE. HE WANTS TO BE PRESIDENT SO HE’S
GOING TO USE IT.>>Stephen: THAT IS TRUE. THANK YOU. THAT IS TRUE. SO LET’S TRY TO AGREE ON
SOMETHING, ARE GUNS A PROBLEM HERE?>>GUNS ARE A PROBLEM IN THE
HANDS OF CRIMINALS AND TERRORISTS, BUT THEY AFFORD THE
POPULATION A LEVEL OF SELF-PROTECTION, WHICH IS WHY
THE FOUNDERS PUT IT INTO THE CONSTITUTION. (APPLAUSE)
CAN I MAKE ONE MORE POINT?>>Stephen:.>>Stephen: BUT WE WON’T TALK
ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE IF YOU DO THAT.>>”LEGENDS AND LIES: THE
PATRIOTS” IS WHAT I CAME TO TALK ABOUT.>>Stephen: I HAVE IT RIGHT
HERE.>>THE REASON WE BEAT THESE
BRITISH OPPRESSORS IS BECAUSE EVERYBODY HAD A GUN, EVERYBODY! AND ALL THESE RED COATS WERE
RUNNING AROUND AND, BANG! THAT’S WHAT SELF-PROTECTION
BRINGS. ALL RIGHT?>>Stephen: I JUST DON’T THINK
OUR SITUATION IS COMPARABLE TO LEXINGTON AND CONCORD.>>BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND
THE HISTORY AND EMOTION TIED INTO THE SECOND AMENDMENT. ESSENTIALLY THERE FOR
SELF-PROTECTION BY LAW ABIDING PEOPLE AND IT WON’T BE
OVERTURNED.>>Stephen: A WELL REGULATED
MILITIA BEING NECESSARY TO A FREE STATE IS THE END OF THE
SENTENCE.>>WON’T BE OVERTURNED. YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT? I DON’T THINK IT’S GOING TO BE
OVERTURNED. LET’S NOT LITIGATE THAT.>>PUNISH THE PEOPLE WHO ABUSE
THE GUNS. PUNISH THEM!>>Stephen: BUT ALSO RESTRICT
SOME GUNS. YOU SAY IT’S POSSIBLE.>>YES.>>Stephen: SO GUNS. I.S.I.S., YOU STAY WE DESTROY
I.S.I.S., YOU SAY THIS KIND OF PROBLEM WILL NEVER END BUT WHAT?>>IT WILL GO DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY
IF YOU CUT THE HEAD OFF THE SNAKE.>>Stephen: IS IT NOT A
PHYSICAL THING THE PROBLEM BUT THE IDEA OF JIHAD AGAINST THE
UNITED STATES THE PROBLEM?>>IDEAS — LOOK.>>Stephen: HOW DO YOU KILL AN
IDEA.>>YOU DON’T. THERE ARE STILL NAZIS RUNNING
AROUND, THERE ARE STIL STILL COMMUNISTS RUNNING AROUND
WANTING TO DOMINATE. YOU TAKE THE PLAYING FIELD AND
DESTROY THE PEOPLE WHO ARE DESTROYING YOUR PEOPLE. THIS WAR! ACCEPT IT!>>Stephen: DO YOU SEE THIS AS
A HATE CRIME THAT HE CHOSE A GAY CLUB?>>EVERYTHING I.S.I.S. DOES IS A
HATE CRIME, THE WHOLE THING! (APPLAUSE)
>>Stephen: HE’S NOT A MEMBER OF I.S.I.S.>>HE USED THE I.S.I.S. IDEOLOGY
TO JUSTIFY KILLING GAYS BECAUSE I.S.I.S. WANTS TO KILL GAYS,
JUST LIKE HITLER WANTED TO KILL GAYS SAME THING.>>Stephen: DO YOU THINK THIS
IS A MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEM.>>NO.>>Stephen: HIS WIFE SAID HE
HAD A HISTORY OF DOMESTIC ABUSE, BIPOLAR AND ON STEROIDS.>>LOOK, THAT’S AN EXCUSE.>>Stephen: NO, SHE’S NOT
EXCUSING HIM, SHE GOT AWAY FROM HIM.>>THIS GUY IS EVIL.>>Stephen:LY ACCEPT EVIL
EXISTS.>>HE’S EVIL AND SO IS I.S.I.S.>>Stephen: WHAT IS THE PROPER
RESPONSE TO EVIL?>>DESTROY IT. CONFRONT IT. YOU DON’T CONTAIN EVIL BECAUSE
YOU CAN’T. YOU DESTROY EVIL, AND I.S.I.S. IS EVIL, THIS MATEEN IS EVIL,
HE’S DEAD, NOW WE HAVE TO GET THE REST OF THEM.>>Stephen: IF YOU DETAIN
EVIL, CAN IT DESTROY ITSELF?>>NO, UNLESS YOU’RE PLAY DOUGH. (LAUGHTER)
THIS IS LIFE AND DEATH. I DON’T WANT TO SEE ANY MORE
DEAD AMERICANS IN THE STREETS. WE HAVE TO PUT THE FEAR OF GOD
IN THESE PEOPLE AND DO IT SOON.>>Stephen: BILL, THANK YOU SO
MUCH FOR BEING HERE. BILL O’REILLY, THE SERIES
“LEGENDS AND LIES: THE PATRIOTS,” AIRS SUNDAYS ON THE
FOX NEWS CHANNEL, BILL O’REILLY, EVERYBODY!

Maurice Vega

100 Responses

  1. You won the war because the French helped you and the British prioritised the indian trade route… History is interesting..

  2. How come that O'Reilly always sounds like a reasonable very intelligent guy on other peoples shows while his own often seems like a huge shitshow.

  3. Wow, the crowd is clapping more for O'Reilly than Colbert. Strange that a couple of years ago from their last debate, Colbert won the praise against O'Reilly. It goes to show that you can be a favorite one day, and then a loser the next. I'm still a Colbert fan though.

  4. Don't you have to dictate what constitutes evil in order to destroy it? Bill has some pretty fascist ideologies.

  5. bill is more or less the same as he has been over the past years. Stephan on the other hand use to be good but now he's a sellout.

  6. this kind of people are what we can call , professional idiots ! they make a very good living entertaining people by being absolute idiots and that's what they do .. professional idiots ! there are a few on media. We need to know to whom do this guys work for so we can find the real villains of the world .. follow the money to the top and bring them to justice, that is what i say

  7. FYI:  Bill O'Reilly Thrives at Fox News, Even as Harassment Settlements …New York Times-7 hours agoSettlements of more sexual harassment claims against Bill O'Reilly …
    Los Angeles Times-24 minutes agoBill O'Reilly, Fox have paid $13M to settle multiple harassment …
    Chicago Tribune-8 minutes agoNYT: 5 Women Took Settlements After Accusing O'Reilly Of Sexual …
    TPM-6 hours agoBombshell Report Reveals New Bill O'Reilly Harassment Accusations
    In-Depth-Vanity Fair-4 hours agoBill O'Reilly and Foxpay $13m settlements to five women
    In-Depth-Daily Mail-3 hours agoHO….HUM.

  8. I thinks the last few sentences were the most important: "This is evil, you must destroy evil." – I think, as long as this kind of simplicistic and dogmatic world view exists, the here mentioned problems won't be solved; because I'd bet everything I own, that those people here mentioned as 'terrorists' are saying THE EXACT SAME THING about the USA… on this scale everyone thinks he or she is the 'good guy' – and as long as this prevails, the one who's going to 'win' is the one with the biggest gun

  9. rewatching this and hearing him talk about how evil has to be destroyed…. sounds like he has a death wish. bye bye billly.

  10. Can you imagine Fallon doing this interview? They'd have dunked Oreos and played charades until the clock ran out.

  11. Say what you want about Bill O'Reily. At least he's willing to go into the democratic lion's den and talk. You don't see many republican leaning people willing to do that.

  12. "we have to put the fear of god in them" probably one of the most destructive sentences ever created… when both sides are trying to do the same thing… this is why religion even tho has some good guidelines and good morals to live by, is also one the most dangerous thing that mankind ever created.

  13. I think Bill hurt his point at the end there by trying to compare modern gun control issues to the British Revolution. He did the impossible just before – he got an applause from Colbert's audience by saying that Americans have a right to self-protection, and guns aren't the problem – bad people are. But then he had to go off on the "If we all had a gun we could make an armed militia agains tthe government" route, which doesn't exactly screen well in an environment where the only strong anti-government cell using weapons is terrorists: the Orlando shooter WAS making a stand against western governance utilizing his right to bear arms. It just happened to be in a way that the rest of us condemn.

  14. "There are still Communists running around…" – O'Reilly 2016. Can we get out the "war with the Commies" mentality please

  15. Wow, I just changed my opinion of Bill O'Reilly. He's a lot smarter and more articulate in this segment than I've ever seen him before.

  16. Colbert could at least have put the obvious point to BIll that that kind of response; full on warfare, creates more violence against the people we're trying to protect (in this case Americans). The deeper level of this is that the confines within which you can talk on coorporate TV is extreme (Letterman banned Bill Hicks already in 1994 and struggled with his producers till he just gave up and became the wax doll). Colbert have been able to fight it pretty well, but in this case (as in some others, especially on patriotism) he's acting as any corperate stooge, to put it bluntly, because he keeps within those limits of debate possible on a large corperate network. The truth is that the US have been acting as aggressors in the Middle East and elsewhere for over half a century, thereby declaring war a long time ago. Any attack (like 911, 7/7, the Paris bombings, etc.) is a response to this war, ie. a counter attack. Not to glorify jihadist Islam or the acts of terrorists, it's just that in base numbers, America is the biggest terrorist state in history of the world (Ghengis Khan didn't have aircraft carries), even though it provides security and holds a liberal value system. (Btw I might take what I said about the Mongolians back, since their empire lasted several decades if I'm not mistaken, and Trump already ushered in the obvious end of Rome).

  17. Colbert should have more Republicans on his show. This is a really interesting discussion and it's great to see both sides of the issue.

  18. But won't Syrians suffer the war from both sides? And soon it will turn to american/russian war or am i missing something!
    Isis isn't "Muslim" group but a terrorist organisation operate under the name of religion because then and only then the west will react to them ! Fuck them

  19. I disagreed with him almost entirely, but the turning point for me was when he said there are Nazis and communists that still want to dominate. That's so true, the ideology is not rid of, just the evil of it is. The same can be said about the KKK, still exists, but doesn't cause harm on the same level as ISIS.

  20. I used to think Bill O'Rilley is a pompous ass.
    Jon Stewart made me have a soft spot for him, and actually try to understand where he's coming from with his opinions.

  21. "We gotta put the fear of god in people" that is EXACTLY what the Orlando shooter did.Just not your particular god.

  22. Once he's off Fox and doesn't feel as much pressure to keep within the view of his watchers, Bill O'Reilly is a pretty reasonable guy. He's at least thought his ideas through, he knows what he's talking about. You've gotta respect him for at least not deviating to what his network wants him to think, but having his own opinions.

  23. Bill can be a smart guy but he can sometimes make too many excuses and sugarcoat people e.g. Donald Trump, when discussing people being shitty and indecent people. Regardless of what political bias or motivation, at the end of the day, call bullshit out on bullshit. U do it with the Democrats, do it with your own Republicans as well, and vice versa Democrats should call each other out as well.

  24. Its funny how he holds the idea of destroying evil when evil can be destroyed but a new evil will always take its place. You can not have good without evil and you can not have light with out darkness. But love how he said because everyone has a gun so they were protected. Tell that to settlers in the wild west era of america.

  25. If guns afford a modicum of self protection, how many shooters have been taken down by civilians with guns?? In the Glasgow attack the guy was taken down by an unarmed baggage handler!!

  26. 1:45 – We stopped lone gunmen, haven't had one in 22 years*.
    (*a dude tried in 2002 and got 2 people, more restrictions were implemented and there hasn't been anything since)

  27. Colbert has to agree that bill was more articulate and informed. The interview made me appreciate bill.

  28. I don't ever think I've ever heard such a simplistic, nihilistic answer to an important question as this guy and it explains why we are where we are. His answer to the 2nd question was the answer to his simplicity. "How would 'militarizing mass murder solve this problem?" "This doesn't". Answer: he doesn't answer the question, and the solution doesn't address anything other than tit-for-tat retribution. Plus his "patsy answer" about Trump shows not only partisan answer but inability to be anything like "fair and balance". "Trumps a noisy ignorant bully, MRS> CLINTON is being 'nuanced'…" . Wow… O'Reilly needs to go back to doing the same as his idolized hero does, and keep grabbing women by their pu**ies, and STFU, and Make America "Terrific" Again…….

  29. This is a question I find Americans never ask: WHY DO THESE PEOPLE HATE US SO MUCH AND WANT TO KILL US?
    Calling them sons of bitches to a round of applause is all very nice, but understanding the root of ISIS and the anguish in the Middle East would go a long way to solve the issue. I'm not saying ISIS is justified in its ideology or its methods, but the USA has to take a long, hard look at their role in creating this mess and not just justify meaningless wars.

  30. A soap box is different from grandstanding.
    This is why Trump is Pres. and citizens use a soap box.
    Grandstanding is a great brokerage tool used for many years to get the job done.
    Although, not exactly honest, morally correct, ethically acceptable, or horribly terrible, it works on the right job, because it is the right tool. Do not use a hammer on glass. Use it on a steel nail driven into the right property, a piece of wood for example . Yes?
    A tool used for the right job is basically the right tool for the job. Yes? yes. Without it, the right tool, or a huge buff or Ego one will f it up. Who has the plan? The right blueprint to build upon? The man of steel. Right?
    Who stops and listens to the person on a soap box? Say one such as I, standing in front of a courthouse touting an issue right or wrong? Where are my tools?
    If one is properly grandstanding with an arsenal of nucs and a button to push anyone will want to walk on glass without cutting their feet. yes?
    A good day to you S C and you sir B O'r. Blessings to you and yours.

  31. This is a fucking joke ! Because his names Omar and he’s Muslim he’s a terrorist but when a shooting happens and it’s a white guy is has to be mental health or some bullshit. Fucking ridiculous

  32. Whether you agree with Colbert or O'Reilly, I think we can all agree that the audience is completely retarded.

  33. Colbert: great at passive aggressive mocking. Not so good on offering up solutions. He seems to think getting rid of guns will eliminate terrorism and all human violence.

  34. The truth and solution lies in between.
    This is the most sense Bill O’Reilly has ever made. That being said, it is a gun problem. It is also a culture problem, mental health problem, a political problem, and many other problems at the same time.

  35. 0:57 oh FDR keeping the Japanese in camps that wasn't just a mistake that is one of our counties great shames that and donald trump. Bill is like well its a mistake but he did it, his reaction is that of someone who put pineapple on their pizza. Well its a mistake totally not a violation of civil right and incredibly racist.

    1:36 well i guess there's no hope just accept the fact that a lot people are going to die.

  36. Hmmm, as a liberal and feminist, it is really hard to look at the Muslim world and go… Yeah, well it's just what they believe. Stoning women, public execution for homosexuals. Extremely sexist ways of life. Xenophobia of the highest calibur. I've never met an American Muslim who acts like these are ok, but they won't say they're bad either. And traveling to the middle East, it's heartbreaking, seeing men public correct women in stores with a slap or two, have her crying in line behind you. Back home, I would have went to jail for kicking the shit out of that guy. There if I acted against him I would face the death penalty. I'm woke, I respect cultures. I definitely have problems with other religions, like the hardcore Jews who throw blood on women, and the churchs crimes speak for themselves. But seriously, the Islamic religion just seems to be the most barbaric of the big 3. Which honestly makes sense, seeing as thier son of God, was a warlord.

  37. the only way to finish this fight with the Islamic extremists is to get so ruthless brutal and destructive that we'd have to become the very terrorist were aiming to destroy otherwise you're just dicking around

  38. Aren't we already at war with these manufactured enemies already???…..Great point Steven, bill oreilly is a blithering idiot war monger!

  39. Russia and Syria destroyed Daesh so you guys can rest easy. Muslim countries don't support daesh by the way. We hate those scum. Bill O'Reilly has some good points though like not taking over a country and just helping the established government which Russia did in US's stead

  40. Wait psychopaths who kill always have a mental disorder. What does Bill O'Reilly mean that the guy wasn't mentally ill. Is that "right" only given to white people?

  41. Look, i'm a hardcore democrat, but i'm also a muslim whose lived in Egypt, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and been to Turkey plenty of times. My father was at the airport in Istanbul during the coup. He was almost killed, In Yemen we were forced to stay inside an American complex because because of extremeist. Saudi is extremely radical, public executions and disgusting laws Egypt has been taken over by a dictator and brought the country to ruin. O'Reilly was right about many things. Especially about declaring war on Isis, Al-Qaeda, Al-shabab, the Taliban, and Boko Haram. Do not go their to occupy, go their to search and destroy the chain of command, get intel on people who are radicalized living in the U.S., If your mentally ill, on the no fly list, a convicted felon you cannot own a firearm. Allow concealed carry permits for those who qualify, have them register their guns, they should be able to own Handguns, Hunting rifles, and shotguns. That is it. Nothing else is needed for self defense and defense of ones property, and for the sport of hunting/shooting for fun. Take away state rights for their laws, and sentences for gun charges and gun related crimes and implement federal ones with Minimums of 7 years, and maximum of a life sentence depending on how many guns, the caliber, semi-fully automatic, the type of gun, handguns, hunting rifles, high powered Assault rifles, shotguns, and SMGS, high caliber guns, sniper rifles, etc. implement detailed informed, Yearly updated and factually accurate Mandatory Background checks, From a nonbiased group similar to the budget committee in the U.S. goverment that says how expensive things will be and so on and so on. along with following up, Yearly psychactric evaluations, and if they take Anti-psychotics or other types of mental health meds such as snri's, ssri's, Mood stabilizers, or other types of medication. Have a law enacted that has psychatrist, doctors give that information over to a department that keeps those recrods extremely confidential, and private. But also use them to stop people who are mentally ill, but able to hide it from buying weapons. i'm a schizophrenic, i threatened to murder my girlfriend at the time because i thought she was putting the voices in my head, and working with god to try and kill me because i believed the left half of me was the Antichrist, and the right half of me was a prophet of god. If i had seen her during that time, i would have killed her. If i had a gun, i would have gone looking for her and murdered her. Now i'm a hardcore Democrat like i said before whose the son of an immigrant father, Born in America, raised all over the middle east, North Africa, and the Meddertarian. Bill is right about killing these terrorist. working with people we trust to restore order, Like the Kurds, Which will eliminate a huge refugee problem. Refugees die trying to escape War, and Terrorism. i know, I've seen it first hand. Some have no choice but to flee. If we implement a transitional trustworthy government, a stable, functioning self sustaining, well armed, well equiped, and well trained military, followed by leaving advisors, intelligence officials, a few surgical strike teams there. The refugees wont be refugees anymore. They hate terrorist more than we do because 99% of the time, they are the victims of terrorism. And they also just want to go back home, and live in their own countries that they love. We will never truly stop these kinds of attacks, Evil exist. But we can prevent, deter, and stop over 95% of them with the right resources, cooperating with trusted sources in foreign governments, and teaching them how to infilitrate, and destroy terrorist cells. And keep our advisors their to monitor the situation and provide help and oversight.

  42. “We have to put the fear of god into them”
    If there’s anything these people aren’t lacking Bill, it’s a strong belief in god

  43. When he was asked what the proper response to evil was it sent shivers. I have to admit O'Reilly here was an ice cold shower.

  44. An average Muslim does not even know what ISIS means! Guess what? Ask the creators of this monster that is the CIA:)))

  45. 1 Thessalonians 5:15
    See that no one repays injury for injury to anyone, but always pursue what is GOOD TOWERD ONE ANOTHER AND TO ALL OTHERS.
    as well Psalm 37:8

  46. This conversation only goes to prove one thing, Dave Letterman stated this awhile back. Bill is a Goon !!!

  47. O'Reilly has a flawed take on guerrilla warfare. There is no "command center." It's a beast with no head. That's why Vietnam went on for 20 years. When you kill an insurgent, you kill a brother, or a nephew, or a son, or a father. Another insurgent takes his place. Let us also not forget that our "precision" airstrikes have non-negligible collateral damage. This creates more insurgents. You do not win this war by annihilation. It's multi-generational warfare.

  48. The reason the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor instead of daring a mainland invasion of the United States is because they knew they weren't just going to be fighting the US military. They knew they were pretty much going to be fighting the entire population since civilians were armed as well and that would leave them with a nearly impossible chance of successfully occupying the mainland. One of the Japanese commanders was quoted as saying "there's a rifle behind every blade of grass"

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post comment